We ask you, urgently: don’t scroll past this
Dear readers, Catholic Online was de-platformed by Shopify for our pro-life beliefs. They shut down our Catholic Online, Catholic Online School, Prayer Candles, and Catholic Online Learning Resources—essential faith tools serving over 1.4 million students and millions of families worldwide. Our founders, now in their 70's, just gave their entire life savings to protect this mission. But fewer than 2% of readers donate. If everyone gave just $5, the cost of a coffee, we could rebuild stronger and keep Catholic education free for all. Stand with us in faith. Thank you.Help Now >
Women in SD Must be Told Unborn Child is a Human Being
FREE Catholic Classes
Dakota law requiring doctors to inform patients that abortion kills a human being is upheld. Planned Parenthood and South Dakota are consider appeal.
Highlights
LifeSiteNews (www.lifesitenews.com)
8/25/2009 (1 decade ago)
Published in Politics & Policy
PIERRE, South Dakota (LifeSiteNews.com) - A Federal Court has upheld the constitutionality of a South Dakota law requiring doctors to inform patients that abortion kills a human being. U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier handed down the ruling on Thursday in a lawsuit against the state filed by Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota objecting to the 2005 law requiring that full information be given to women seeking abortions.
Judge Schreier said that although doctors must use the term 'human being,' it can be used in a "biological sense" and not an "ideological" one. The law specifies that a woman must be told that abortion "will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being."
In the same ruling Schreier, who had issued an order in 2005 preventing the law from coming into effect, overturned a requirement that women be informed that abortion increases the risk of suicide and suicidal thoughts. Schreier called these disclosure provisions "untruthful and misleading."
Also struck down was a provision requiring doctors to tell a woman that she has an existing legally protected relationship with her unborn child. Schreier ruled that "in the legal context, a pregnant mother cannot have a 'relationship' with a 'human being,' as that word is defined in the statute."
Both Planned Parenthood and the state of South Dakota are considering whether to appeal. "I think the most important part of the statute has been upheld," Assistant Attorney General John Guhin said.
Sarah Stoesz, CEO of Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota said, "We're thrilled. It's a major victory for women in South Dakota and doctors who want to be free" from having to make ideologically charged statements.
Attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) who had authored and filed an amicus curić brief on behalf of the Family Research Council, said, "A woman's life is worth more than Planned Parenthood's bottom line, so we're pleased the abortion industry failed in its attempt to strike down this law."
In a statement, ADF Senior Legal Counsel Steven H. Aden commented, "We find it incredible, however, for the court to determine that the law cannot acknowledge that a 'pregnant woman has an existing relationship with that unborn human being' because some human beings are somehow not 'persons.'"
"The court ruled that a woman has more of a relationship with the abortionist than her preborn baby. All human beings are persons," Aden added.
Leslee Unruh, founder of the pro-life Alpha Center pregnancy counseling centre in Sioux Falls, an intervening party in the suit, said the ruling is a "huge, fatal blow" to the abortion lobby and a step forward in the "unraveling" of Roe v. Wade. Unruh told the New York Times that her organization will appeal the decisions on the suicide and relationship provisions.
"We take the human being part and go to the Supreme Court and put the human relationship in. That knocks out Roe v. Wade," she said.
South Dakota recently attempted to ban abortion within the state entirely. In 2006 the state Legislature passed a bill that prohibited all abortion except in those cases where continuing a pregnancy would pose a medical threat to the mother's life. This measure was overturned by voters in the 2006 election by a margin of 56-44 per cent after abortion lobbyists ran a campaign focusing on the bill's exclusion of exceptions in cases of rape.
Another measure was attempted by the state that included the exceptions for pregnancy resulting from rape or incest as well as when there is "substantial risk" of serious permanent injury or death to the mother. This second attempt, Measure 11, was defeated in the November 2008 election after pro-life advocates were split over support for the measure.
Leslee Unruh, a leading supporter of Measure 11, said at the time it was a victory for abortion advocates whose only interest, she said, was not in the health of women but an ideological devotion to abortion on demand.
---
LifeSiteNews.com is a non-profit Internet service dedicated to issues of culture, life, and family. It was launched in September 1997. LifeSiteNews Daily News reports and information pages are used by numerous organizations and publications, educators, professionals and political, religious and life and family organization leaders and grassroots people across North America and internationally.
Join the Movement
When you sign up below, you don't just join an email list - you're joining an entire movement for Free world class Catholic education.
-
Mysteries of the Rosary
-
St. Faustina Kowalska
-
Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary
-
Saint of the Day for Wednesday, Oct 4th, 2023
-
Popular Saints
-
St. Francis of Assisi
-
Bible
-
Female / Women Saints
-
7 Morning Prayers you need to get your day started with God
-
Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Introducing "Journey with the Messiah" - A Revolutionary Way to Experience the Bible
-
Pope Francis Calls Young Cancer Patients "Witnesses of Hope" During Audience at the Vatican
-
Senate to Vote on Protecting Babies Who Survive Abortions
-
Mel Gibson Prepares to Bring The Resurrection of the Christ to the Big Screen in 2025
-
Catholic Response to Devastating Los Angeles Wildfires
Daily Catholic
- Daily Readings for Monday, January 13, 2025
- St. Hilary of Poitiers: Saint of the Day for Monday, January 13, 2025
- Prayer for a Blessing on the New Year: Prayer of the Day for Tuesday, December 31, 2024
- Daily Readings for Sunday, January 12, 2025
- St. Marguerite Bourgeoys: Saint of the Day for Sunday, January 12, 2025
- St. Theresa of the Child Jesus: Prayer of the Day for Monday, December 30, 2024
Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.
Catholic Online is a Project of Your Catholic Voice Foundation, a Not-for-Profit Corporation. Your Catholic Voice Foundation has been granted a recognition of tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law.