California Supreme Court to Hear Anti-Prop. 8 Cases
FREE Catholic Classes
The justices directed the defendants in the cases to submit arguments by Dec. 19. Lawyers for the plaintiffs must respond before January 5.
Highlights
LifeSiteNews (www.lifesitenews.com)
11/21/2008 (1 decade ago)
Published in Politics & Policy
SACRAMENTO (LifeSiteNews) - Following the advice of the state's attorney general, the California Supreme Court agreed Wednesday to speed up the legal process by reviewing three lower court cases that aim to nullify Proposition 8, California's true marriage amendment.
The court has also officially refused demands from the homosexual quarter to allow same-sex "marriages" to continue while the hearings proceed.
Both Attorney General Jerry Brown and Proposition 8 supporters had requested the court hear the cases swiftly in order to quell increasing agitation in California and across the country sparked by the passage of the amendment. Proposition 8 reinstituted legal protection of true marriage after the Supreme Court imposed same-sex "marriage" on California in May, ignoring a 2000 voter-approved true marriage law.
The justices directed the defendants in the cases to submit arguments by Dec. 19. Lawyers for the plaintiffs must respond before Jan. 5.
Spokeswoman for the Court, Lynn Holton, said oral arguments would be heard in March at the earliest.
According to the Union-Tribune, 6 of the 7 Supreme Court justices voted to accept the cases, three of whom were against same-sex "marriage" in May. Only one judge favored allowing same-sex "marriages" throughout the hearings.
Both supporters and critics of Proposition 8 hailed the Court's decision.
Same-sex "marriage" advocates say they are confident that the amendment will be struck down as an illegal revision that breaches the rights of homosexual couples. Others, however, are equally confident that Proposition 8 will prevail, saying the scope of the litigation that the court will address extends only to the legality of Proposition 8 in terms of the California Constitution, and not to its overall propriety or cultural impact. The Court will also review whether same-sex "marriages" already enacted should continue to be recognized under Proposition 8.
The official proponents of Proposition 8 said they are "profoundly gratified" that the California Supreme Court granted all their requests. The court not only accepted jurisdiction of the cases but allowed the Yes on 8 campaign to intervene, and refused outside groups direct participation in the litigation.
"This is a great day for the rule of law and the voters of California," said ProtectMarriage.com General Counsel Andy Pugno, an attorney allied with the Alliance Defense Fund. "This order means that voters will get their day in court and ensures that voters will have a vigorous defense of Proposition 8 before the California Supreme Court. We are profoundly gratified with the Court's order and are confident that Proposition 8 will be upheld."
Because the Court will allow the Yes on 8 campaign to defend the amendment in court, Pugno said voters can be sure "there will be a thorough and vigorous defense of Prop. 8." If the court had not permitted the Yes on 8 to intervene, attorney general Jerry Brown, who is known to be a supporter of homosexual "marriage," would have been the amendment's only defendant before the court.
"Since the attorney general was an active opponent of Proposition 8, we did not want the fate of the measure to rest in his defense of it," said Pugno.
The case originally launched by the city of San Francisco against the amendment has recently gathered other municipal and county authorities as official plaintiffs. These include the board of supervisors for Alameda, Marin, San Mateo and Santa Cruz counties. Already listed as plaintiffs are representatives of the cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles, as well as the counties of Santa Clara and Los Angeles. The Union-Tribune reports the city of San Diego also hopes to follow suit.
According to the tally thus far, 42 of California's 58 counties supported Proposition 8 by popular vote, including the counties of Los Angeles and San Diego.
---
LifeSiteNews.com is a non-profit Internet service dedicated to issues of culture, life, and family. It was launched in September 1997. LifeSiteNews Daily News reports and information pages are used by numerous organizations and publications, educators, professionals and political, religious and life and family organization leaders and grassroots people across North America and internationally.
Join the Movement
When you sign up below, you don't just join an email list - you're joining an entire movement for Free world class Catholic education.
-
Mysteries of the Rosary
-
St. Faustina Kowalska
-
Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary
-
Saint of the Day for Wednesday, Oct 4th, 2023
-
Popular Saints
-
St. Francis of Assisi
-
Bible
-
Female / Women Saints
-
7 Morning Prayers you need to get your day started with God
-
Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Daily Catholic
- Daily Readings for Thursday, January 16, 2025
- St. Fursey: Saint of the Day for Thursday, January 16, 2025
- Prayer for a Blessing on the New Year: Prayer of the Day for Tuesday, December 31, 2024
- Daily Readings for Wednesday, January 15, 2025
- St. Paul the Hermit: Saint of the Day for Wednesday, January 15, 2025
- St. Theresa of the Child Jesus: Prayer of the Day for Monday, December 30, 2024
Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.
Catholic Online is a Project of Your Catholic Voice Foundation, a Not-for-Profit Corporation. Your Catholic Voice Foundation has been granted a recognition of tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law.