Skip to content

We ask you, urgently: don’t scroll past this

Dear readers, Catholic Online was de-platformed by Shopify for our pro-life beliefs. They shut down our Catholic Online, Catholic Online School, Prayer Candles, and Catholic Online Learning Resources—essential faith tools serving over 1.4 million students and millions of families worldwide. Our founders, now in their 70's, just gave their entire life savings to protect this mission. But fewer than 2% of readers donate. If everyone gave just $5, the cost of a coffee, we could rebuild stronger and keep Catholic education free for all. Stand with us in faith. Thank you.

Help Now >

OUTRAGEOUS! Bank breaks into WRONG house, sells child's possessions, refuses to pay!

Free World Class Education
FREE Catholic Classes
We hope victims sue for one million dollars and win.

An Ohio woman is facing an uphill battle in an effort to recover the value of property stolen by her home by a thief. The reason for the problem has everything to do with who the thief is and the fact that police have refused to get involved.

Highlights

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)
Catholic Online (https://www.catholic.org)
7/29/2013 (1 decade ago)

Published in U.S.

Keywords: Bank, First National, Wellston, Ohio, Barnett, house, property, receipts, lawsuit, forclosure

MCARTHUR, OHIO (Catholic Online) - Katie Barnett, 36, who works as a nurse in McArthur, Ohio, left home for two weeks. When she returned, she couldn't get into her own house.

Barnett found the lock were changed and her property was removed from the residence. After calling police, she was told it was probably the work of squatters and they refused to get involved. Shortly thereafter, she learned who the thieves really were.

They were representatives of First National Bank in Wellston.

Barnett is not a customer of that bank, nor ever has been, despite that officials from the bank decided to foreclose and repossess her home. The incident occurred after two agents of the bank were sent to repossess a foreclosed property on her street.

The agents admitted they found their way to the house by GPS, and that they weren't too sure about how to use the GPS device they had, but decided on Barnett's house when they noticed the lawn wasn't mowed.

They then proceeded to remove about $18,000 in property from the house and change the locks. Dutifully, they recorded the nature and value of the spoils and changed the locks.

Seeking to resolve the matter, Barnett contacted the bank and was told to submit a list of missing items so the bank could reimburse her the losses. When she did so, and asked for $18,000, the bank pushed back, claiming her records didn't match theirs and that according to bank CEO, Anthony Thorne "the value she assigned to those items - is inconsistent with the list and descriptions of items removed that was prepared by the employees who did the work, and with the list and values of missing items provided by the homeowner herself as recorded in an earlier telephone conversation with one of our representatives."

So effectively, a bank made an egregious error, and instead of resolving it as quickly as possible, decided to nickel-and-dime the victim for what is really a paltry sum, in bank-terms.

Barnett said she was compelled to buy her kids new clothes because among the items seized by the bank were her children's clothes.

They also took a pool from the back yard, two engines that were being serviced, and parts for those engines.

Luckily, the beds were among the few items left behind.

The bank has told Barnett to produce receipts for everything. Barnett replied, saying the receipts were with the items the bank took from her home and threw away.

"He [Thorne] told me that I would probably need receipts for everything that they took and they were not paying retail," Barnett said. "I told him I wasn't running a yard sale and asking them to make me an offer. I told him I don't keep receipts around for everything I have just in case a bank comes by and steals my stuff. And if I did, where do you think it would be? With the stuff that you threw away."

The police have refused to get involved, suggesting the matter is civil rather than criminal. However, a criminal offense, in the form of trespass, breaking and entering, and grand theft undoubtedly did occur. It may not have been with criminal intent, yet it was certainly because agents of the bank failed to exercise due diligence in their efforts.

Now, Barnett has been compelled to retain an attorney and is planning to file a civil suit to obtain compensation for her $18,000 in lost property.

We think that amount should be paid immediately. Along with another one million dollars. That should teach a lesson in due diligence, humility, and citizenship to a bank that has the audacity to break, enter, and sell clothes off the backs of children.

---


'Help Give every Student and Teacher FREE resources for a world-class Moral Catholic Education'


Copyright 2021 - Distributed by Catholic Online

Join the Movement
When you sign up below, you don't just join an email list - you're joining an entire movement for Free world class Catholic education.

Catholic Online Logo

Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.

Catholic Online is a Project of Your Catholic Voice Foundation, a Not-for-Profit Corporation. Your Catholic Voice Foundation has been granted a recognition of tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law.