Skip to content
Little girl looking Dear readers, Catholic Online was de-platformed by Shopify for our pro-life beliefs. They shut down our Catholic Online, Catholic Online School, Prayer Candles, and Catholic Online Learning Resources—essential faith tools serving over 1.4 million students and millions of families worldwide. Our founders, now in their 70's, just gave their entire life savings to protect this mission. But fewer than 2% of readers donate. If everyone gave just $5, the cost of a coffee, we could rebuild stronger and keep Catholic education free for all. Stand with us in faith. Thank you. Help Now >

French High Court Affirms Traditional Marriage

Free World Class Education
FREE Catholic Classes
The French Constitutional Council is the nation's highest authority on the constitution

This fall, the Council accepted the case of a lesbian couple that challenged the constitutionality of the French Civil Code (which identifies marriage between man and woman), claiming the exclusion of same-sex marriage violated a citizen's right to lead a "normal family life" and the principle of equality before the law.

Highlights

By Lauren Funk
Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute (www.c-fam.org/)
2/4/2011 (1 decade ago)

Published in Europe

Keywords: Marriage, true marriage, Homosexual, lesbian, France, same sex marriage,

P>PARIS, France (C-FAM) A ruling in the homeland of "égalité" last week found the French prohibition of same-sex marriage is in accord with the French constitution, effectively ruling that there is nothing unequal about upholding the definition of marriage as between man and woman.

The demand for "equality" is the hallmark of most national and international campaigns for homosexual rights, particularly those concerned with same-sex marriage.  Discussions at the UN regarding sexual orientation are rife with references to equality and non-discrimination.

The French Constitutional Council is the nation's highest authority on the constitution, and while it normally advises the government on the constitutionality of elections and laws, it also has authority to rule on constitutionality of individual cases brought to it by French citizens. 

This fall, the Council accepted the case of a lesbian couple that challenged the constitutionality of the French Civil Code (which identifies marriage between man and woman), claiming the exclusion of same-sex marriage violated a citizen's right to lead a "normal family life" and the principle of equality before the law.

The Council ruled last Friday that because of the difference of situations between same-sex and heterosexual couples, the difference in treatment in family laws is justified and not in violation of the principle of equality.  As for the right to a normal family life, the court found that the pacte civil de solidarité, a form of civil union that accords a plethora of legal, fiscal, and official benefits, is sufficient for a "normal family life."

The Council refrained from commenting on same-sex marriage itself, stating it is a matter of politics, not law, to decide such an issue.  The opposition government, France's Socialist Party, has already promised to call for a vote on same-sex marriage in Parliament this summer.

Regardless of the parliament's vote, there is a distinct possibility that activist groups will take the case to the European Court of Human Rights, in the hopes that the Court will challenge France's decision. 

This past Tuesday, a UK-based advocacy group launched a campaign to get the European Court of Human Rights to overturn the UK's ban on same sex marriage.  A similar legal campaign may not be far off for France, since the case is "ripe for review by the Strasburg court," according to Roger Kiska, Legal Counsel at the Alliance Defense Fund.  However, he foresees no chance of the European Court of Human Rights being able to successfully challenge the Council's decision. 

According to Kiska, a same-sex marriage case was brought before the court already, which resulted in a ruling that it is "within a state's margin of appreciation to decide upon its own family laws."  The French Council's decision that the difference in treatment in family laws is justified falls within the "margin of appreciation" outlined in the European court's ruling, and thus the Court should be unable to challenge France's decision. 

With this in mind, and hopeful that the French Parliament will uphold traditional marriage when it inevitably comes to a vote, Kiska seems to be optimistic about the future of marriage legislation in this powerful European nation.

-----

Lauren is an Operations Associate at C-FAM's New York office. She is a recent graduate of Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service, where she majored in International Politics and studied French, Arabic, and Political Philosophy as well.

---

'This author writes for C-FAM. This article first appeared in the Friday Fax, an internet report published weekly by C-FAM (Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute), a New York and Washington DC-based research institute (www.c-fam.org). This article appears with permission."

Join the Movement
When you sign up below, you don't just join an email list - you're joining an entire movement for Free world class Catholic education.

Catholic Online Logo

Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, © Copyright 2024 Catholic Online. Any unauthorized use, without prior written consent of Catholic Online is strictly forbidden and prohibited.

Catholic Online is a Project of Your Catholic Voice Foundation, a Not-for-Profit Corporation. Your Catholic Voice Foundation has been granted a recognition of tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. Your gift is tax-deductible as allowed by law.