Both Obama and Romney apps have no use past VP selection
Formerly groundbreaking Obama app now seen as 'old hat'
Both the Mitt Romney and Barack Obama campaigns have unveiled new
smart-phone apps. The Romney app quickly jumped to a sizable lead in
downloads over the Obama app. According to iTunes, the Romney app No. 15
among free apps, while President Obama's languished at No. 149. Some
analysts view the apps as little more than gimmicks that will not
outlast Romney's announcement for his running mate.
Some say that Mitt Romney's app will have no ostensible purpose after the vice-presidential selection is announced, expected at the end of August.
Romney's app will have no ostensible purpose after the vice-presidential selection is announced, expected at the end of August. The app encourages users to follow the campaign on Twitter and connect on Facebook.
In contrast, the Obama app is more complex and more of a grass-roots mobilizing tool. It will allow users to find campaign events in their area and gives them an easy ways to volunteer, make phone calls and canvass.
In 2008, the Obama team was truly groundbreaking in the ways it employed technology. In the four long years since then, Americans' reliance on smart phones has increased exponentially, creating even more opportunities for campaigns to communicate with voters.
Other than journalists, who must have the apps, who is actually downloading these apps? It has also become apparent that the smart-phone campaign has come with some less positive side effects.
Many agree that the 2012 campaign is not only entering new territory when it comes to technology, but is also leading to triviality. Much of the blame has been placed on the fact that social-media communication tends to thrive on cheap shots and mountains-from-molehill controversies.
BuzzFeed posted a telling screen-shot comparison this week of subject lines in Obama campaign e-mails from 2008 and 2012. From 2008, headings read "Strategy briefing," "June numbers," and "Our platform." In 2012, messages went out with the subject lines: "Warning: This picture is cute," "You'll need to comb your hair for this," and "So cool."
While this strategy may show that the Obama campaign needs to distract users from the bad economy, it's hard to see how an "LOL campaign" that focuses on gimmicks and gaffes will give voters any more confidence in their leaders.
© 2012, Catholic Online. Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for December 2013
General Intention: Victimized Children. That children who are victims of abandonment or violence may find the love and protection they need.
Missionary Intention: Prepare the Savior's Coming. That Christians, enlightened by the Word incarnate, may prepare humanity for the Savior's coming.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Technology News
- Through the air: The sound of computer keystroke can now be used for spying purposes
- Hubble discovery puts us closer than ever to finding alien life - water discovered on 5 planets
- Israeli scientists discover substance that may fend off Alzheimer's, Aging and Parkinson's
- Don't cry for Comet ISON, another stupendous sky show is coming!
- FANTASTIC! Mile-long floating city would house 50,000 permanent residents
- COMET ISON BREAKS UP!
- Where you can watch the death of Comet ISON live as it happens
- Astronomers observe the biggest, and scariest event in the universe since the beginning of time
- Showtime for Comet ISON!
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?