Immigration reform may bring sinister new government database
Legislation currently only allows database to be used for employment - now
A national biometric database of virtually every adult in the United States - brought into being by immigration reform legislation, has many domestic privacy groups highly concerned. They fear that such a ubiquitous national identification system would trample over basic civil rights.
As included in the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, the "photo tool" is aimed at curbing employment of undocumented immigrants.
At risk: Employers will be required to research every new hire in the database to verify that they match their photo.
As included in the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, the "photo tool" is aimed at curbing employment of undocumented immigrants. Civil rights groups fear that this will open a door to even more governmental control. Identification is required at polling places, to rent a house, buy a gun, open a bank account, acquire credit, board a plane or even attend a sporting event or log on the internet.
"Think of it as a government version of Foursquare, with Big Brother cataloging every check-in," Wired columnist David Kravets says.
"It starts to change the relationship between the citizens and state, you do have to get permission to do things," Chris Calabrese, a congressional lobbyist with the American Civil Liberties Union says. "More fundamentally, it could be the start of keeping a record of all things."
Currently legislation solely allows the database to be used solely for employment purposes. Historically -- such limitations don't last. The Social Security card, for example, was created to track your government retirement benefits; it is now required for you to purchase health insurance.
"The Social Security number itself, it's pretty ubiquitous in your life," Calabrese said.
David Bier, an analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, agrees. "The most worrying aspect is that this creates a principle of permission basically to do certain activities and it can be used to restrict activities," he said. "It's like a national ID system without the card."
For the moment, the debate in the Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to resume debate on the package this week.
© 2013, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for December 2013
General Intention: Victimized Children. That children who are victims of abandonment or violence may find the love and protection they need.
Missionary Intention: Prepare the Savior's Coming. That Christians, enlightened by the Word incarnate, may prepare humanity for the Savior's coming.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- Colin Powell, Republican, comes out in favor of single-payer healthcare system
- Francis, Human Dignity and Culture: Time for a Radical Christian Action Movement
- Obamacare is a success! But not the kind you'll want to celebrate
- New 'Obamacare' health plans may exclude major hospitals
- Marriage Liberation Movement: Global Defense of Marriage in France, China and Around the World
- Principles are expensive: Republican governors missing out on billions in Medicaid funds
- Rush Limbaugh is Wrong, Karen Finney of MSNBC is Nuts: Pope Francis and Capitalism
- NSA REVELATIONS: Ways that would have been previously unimaginable
- Gap between rich and poor: Income gap threatens U.S. 'way of life,' Obama says
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?