Why this high profile resignation will cost millions
Savings may be realized later.
Jesse Jackson Jr.'s swift resignation, on the heels of his reelection, will cost taxpayers a lot of money. Under investigation by federal authorities for alleged misuse of campaign funds, Jackson suddenly resigned even before the latest votes were certified, citing a mental health condition.
Jackson insisted on running for reelection despite his inability to perform duties. Now taxpayers are left holding the bag.
The reason for the price tag is the state must prepare and hold two elections, a primary and a general, and both elections will be special elections, so they will not be piggybacked on normal, already paid-for elections.
This bill is just the latest one to hit taxpayers as a result of Jackson's activities. According to prosecutors, Jackson may have inappropriately spent money monitored by Congress. Jackson has admitted to being the subject of no less than two separate federal investigations.
The House Ethics Committee and the FBI are both investigating him.
Despite these investigations, and his long absence (since June) for bipolar disorder treatment, Jackson was reelected by a large margin.
Jackson has also cited clinical depression and gastrointestinal problems for his absence from work. He is being treated at the Mayo Clinic.
Jackson's hijinks have not been restricted to money. In 2007, Jackson nearly came to blows with Republican legislator, Lee Terry (R - NB) and he challenged Terry to a fight. Although Jackson eventually backed down from the challenge, a man later claiming to be his "hit man" showed up in Terry's office, which prompted an immediate FBI investigation.
Despite the high cost to replace Jackson, it may be well worth it. The troubled representative has been expensive in terms of behavior, investigations, and now special elections. In addition, there is no telling how much money he has misspent, if such allegations are true.
Although taxpayers are spending upwards of $5 million to replace the troubled Jackson, the cost may pay off in savings later.
© 2012, Distributed by NEWS CONSORTIUM.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: Jackson Jr. Illinois, elections, representitive
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Politics & Policy News
- Special Report from the Virginia Republican Nominating Convention: A Time To Choose - Life
- Carney still insists nobody told Obama about IRS investigation
- State Department insider warns more whistle-blowers to come on Benghazi scandal
- Hillary better be prepared, House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa says
- E.W. Jackson Wins Nomination as Republican Candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Virginia
- 'Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was!' Virginia GOP nominee says
- Food stamps hang in the balance as lawmakers debate cost
- News to ruin your morning: IRS official who targeted conservatives for audit now oversees your Obamacare compliance
- Culture of Corruption, Obama pays Sarah Ingram extra for her harassment of conservatives
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?