Skip to main content


Senators Demand Answers: Why Did Susan Rice Insist Video Caused Benghazi Attack?

9/29/2012

(Page 2 of 2)

in response to a video that Muslims find offensive."

--"The reason why there is unrest is because of the film; this is in response to the film."

--"But the unrest that we've seen is in reaction to a film with which the United States government had no involvement."

Sept. 14 (late afternoon): State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland tells a daily press briefing: "I am going to frustrate all of you infinitely by telling you that now that we have an open FBI investigation on the death of these four Americans, we are not going to be in a position to talk at all about what the U.S. government may or may not be learning about how any of this happened - not who they were, not how they happened, not what happened to Ambassador Stevens, not any of it - until the Justice Department is ready to talk about the investigation that it's got.

"So I'm going to send you to the FBI on any of those kinds of questions, and they're probably not going to talk to you about them while the investigation is open."

Sept. 16: Rice does the round of Sunday talk shows:

On ABC's This Week:

"First of all, It's important to know that there's an FBI investigation that has begun and will take some time to be completed. That will tell us with certainty what transpired.  But our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous - not a premeditated - response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated.

". What happened this week in Cairo, in Benghazi, in many other parts of the region was a result - a direct result of a heinous and offensive video that was widely disseminated, that the U.S. government had nothing to do with, which we have made clear is reprehensible and disgusting."

On CBS' Face the Nation:

"Based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy - sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that - in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution. And that it spun from there into something much, much more violent ... We do not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned."

On NBC's Meet the Press:

"Putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of - of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video.  What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding."

On Fox News Sunday:

"But what sparked the recent violence was the airing on the Internet of a very hateful very offensive video that has offended many people around the world."

Sept. 17: Nuland tells a press briefing: "Ambassador Rice outranks me, as does my own boss, so she is often at liberty to say more than I am . the comments that Ambassador Rice made accurately reflect our government's initial assessment."


 


- - -

CNSNews.com is a division of the Media Research Center, a not-for-profit 501 (c)(3) organization. Like National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, CNSNews.com is able to provide its services and information to the public at no cost, thanks to the generous support of our thousands of donors and their tax-deductible contributions.This article is reprinted with permission.

Keywords: Libya, terroist attack, Susan Rice, Leon Panetta, Benghazi, Patrick Goodenough

NEWSLETTERS »

E-mail:       Zip Code: (ex. 90001)
Today's Headlines

Sign up for a roundup of the day's top stories. 5 days / week. See Sample

Previous Page  1 | 2

Rate This Article

Very Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at All

Yes, I am Interested No, I am not Interested

Rate Article

1 - 3 of 3 Comments

  1. Daniel
    8 months ago

    Susan Rice insisted the video caused the Benghazi attack because it did. What they aren't telling you is that they (the US government) themselves sent the video. Why did they send the video to incite terrorism?

  2. Charles Brister
    8 months ago

    Susan Rice made a clear distinction between the spontaneous protestors who reacted to the video, and "the opportunistic extremist" who went to the consulate in Libya embassy heavily armed after the protest began. It would be far ...
    more accurate to post a link to her interview, rather than commentary from a third party, conservative publication. Consider replacing that with a link to this interview, to set the record straight.

    Susan Rice Interview on Meet the Press - 9/16/12 - YouTube.
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHAIl7_ITE0

    2:00 into the interview she makes the distinction.

  3. yongbo
    8 months ago

    If the government can't face up with the national security challenges, then enemies of America will be more encouraged to attack us on all fronts and will strike fear among our allies knowing that America has been so weak or weakened by its appeasement foreign policy. If the American people think that Al Qaeda and terrorism had been decimated by the killing of Usama bin Laden, then we are wrong...they are very much alive and even stronger. They even chant""" "we are Usamas, we are Usamas."...So, Mr. Biden, with due respect, Al Qaeda is very much alive today than ever before.

Leave a Comment

Comments submitted must be civil, remain on-topic and not violate any laws including copyright. We reserve the right to delete any comments which are abusive, inappropriate or not constructive to the discussion.

Though we invite robust discussion, we reserve the right to not publish any comment which denigrates the human person, undermines marriage and the family, or advocates for positions which openly oppose the teaching of the Catholic Church.

This is a supervised forum and the Editors of Catholic Online retain the right to direct it.

We also reserve the right to block any commenter for repeated violations. Your email address is required to post, but it will not be published on the site.

We ask that you NOT post your comment more than once. Catholic Online is growing and our ability to review all comments sometimes results in a delay in their publication.

Send me important information from Catholic Online and it's partners. See Sample

Post Comment


Newsletter Sign Up

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Second Corinthians 9:6-11
But remember: anyone who sows sparsely will reap sparsely as ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 112:1-2, 3-4, 9
Alleluia! How blessed is anyone who fears Yahweh, who delights ... Read More

Gospel, Matthew 6:1-6, 16-18
'Be careful not to parade your uprightness in public to attract ... Read More

Saint of the Day

June 19 Saint of the Day

St. Romuald
June 19: St. Romuald was born at Ravenna about the year 956. In spite ... Read More