Skip to content
Catholic Online Logo

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

1/8/2014 (8 months ago)

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

When shortages produce inconvenience, and even result in lack of care (as with the lengthy waits required for some tests and treatment in other socialized systems), you will have no other option. Our patient-oriented system will indeed become like the DMV.

2014 is an election year, and it is incumbent upon every voting American to become aware of what is happening. Your health care system is being destroyed, and your future experience with Obamacare will make you long for an experience like mine at the VA today. The American people have always been caring and generous, and they want to see healthcare for everyone. The problem is that the system proposed cannot possibly work, and its implementation will cause the existing system, imperfect as it is, to crumble. Bear this in mind as you consider whom to support this fall.

Highlights

By Dr. Frederick Liewehr

Catholic Online (www.catholic.org)

1/8/2014 (8 months ago)

Published in Politics & Policy

Keywords: Obamacare, bureaucracy, Veterans Administration, social justice, good government, Dr. Frederick Liewehr


RICHMOND,VA (Catholic Online) - Today I visited my local VA for a long overdue checkup. Although I arrived 30 minutes before my appointment, I spent the time circling the parking lot, along with many other vets, looking for a parking place. Cars were parked illegally everywhere, because there simply is not enough parking available for staff and patients.

Rumor has it that there was a plan to build a parking ramp, but for some reason this plan was scrapped, so the VA response was to do nothing. In a private facility, areas would have been cleared and paved, or perhaps graveled at low cost to provide the needed parking. However, at the government facility, they simply did nothing. So, you can either park illegally, and risk getting a ticket, or being towed, or you can miss your appointment.

Once I saw my doctor (another 30 minute wait), I needed to get blood drawn. There were 40 people ahead of me, and one station open. Over the course of the next nearly two hours, eventually a second, and finally a third station opened up, so I eventually was seen. The tech was super; the problem was that there simply were not enough techs.

This is a glimpse of Obamacare to come, too many people vying for too few parking places and medical personnel. When shortages produce inconvenience, and even result in lack of care (as with the lengthy waits required for some tests and treatment in other socialized systems), you will have no other option. Our patient-oriented system will indeed become like the DMV.

I mention this simply to point out that there are many facets of Obamacare that simply could not possibly work. The entire system is a socialist dream world that anyone with even a nodding acquaintance with economics would find laughable. If you think this is too harsh a judgment, let us look at this "health insurance" plan.

Insurance means shared risk. Let us take one hazard - heart disease. In a given population there are some people at greater risk for heart disease, and some at lesser risk. The key for the company issuing the insurance is to know what the chances are that someone will develop heart disease, and what it will cost to treat them. So, if you insure 1000 people, and the actuarial tables (the historical risk) say that 2 will develop heart disease every year, and it will cost $30,000 each to treat them, then the cost to insure the 1000 people against heart disease is $60,000 per year. To share the risk equally, each person would have to pay $60, so the insurance company could charge a $75 premium to cover their administrative costs and make a nice profit.

However, that profit depends upon the accuracy of the actuarial data that say two people per year from that 1000 people will contract the disease in the insured group. For the ones who contract the disease, $75 is a great bargain compared to $30,000 out of pocket. For those who do not contract the disease, however, $75 is a lot of money for nothing. So, those who think they will get the disease will buy the insurance, and those who do not will tend not to buy the insurance.

I experienced this when I retired from the Army. While I was on active duty, I had term life insurance called SGLI (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance) that was provided at very low cost. When I left, I was entitled to convert this to a VGLI (Veteran's Group Life Insurance) policy with no physical exam - everyone was eligible.

To understand how this works, consider a group policy. If an insurer insures everyone in a large group, the military or Wal-Mart for example, the actuarial tables will work. If the group consists mostly of young healthy soldiers, the risk of death (apart from that incurred in battle) is very low. So the insurance can be cheap.

If the group changes, however, the risk changes. In the case of VGLI, the group consists of much older people, many of whom have pre-existing illnesses and bear the results of trauma from their military careers. Some of these were waiting with me to have their blood drawn. The risk of death for this group is much greater than for the SGLI group, so the insurance premiums have to be higher. This is particularly true because everyone is automatically eligible.

If a healthy veteran shops around, he can find a lower risk group than his fellow veterans without much difficulty. The actuarial rates are better for a group of younger civilians, and the premiums are accordingly lower. So, rather than the VGLI, a healthy veteran will choose private insurance. The removal of healthy veterans from the VGLI group worsens the risk for that group, and thus increases the premiums. It is a vicious circle, and soon the only vets in the VGLI pool are those who are at high risk of dying, and the premiums are sky high.

In Obamacare, the premise was health insurance for everyone, and that includes those with preexisting illnesses. Of course those people will sign up, because the chances of them using their insurance benefits is very high. Healthy people who do not expect to use their insurance benefits and who do not want to pay for other people's treatment would tend not to buy the insurance, and therefore not sign up. These are both eminently practical and reasonable decisions, and completely predictable by anyone who gives it the least bit of thought.

So, under Obamacare, insurance rates would HAVE TO increase in order to pay for the high risk people who can now sign up at lower rates than the actuarial tables would predict for them. Participation by healthy people would NOT occur because the insurance would be expensive and very unlikely to be used.

So, two issues are clear, and these were both misrepresented by Obama and Company. First, Obamacare cannot exist as insurance underwritten by private insurance companies. If the government insists that people with pre-existing illness can sign up, and that they do not have to pay premiums until they sign up in the ambulance on the way to the hospital, the insurance companies would have to either charge unaffordable premiums or lose money and go out of business. Thus, there is no possible way that insurance premiums under this system could do anything but rise dramatically, which is eminently predictable, and what we are already seeing. So the promise of decreased insurance premiums was a lie.

Second, the only way that insurance premiums could possibly be affordable would be to force everyone to buy the insurance. Otherwise, as we have seen, only the high risk people would participate. That is tough in a supposedly free society, and the tax penalty proposed will not be effective, as it is considerably less than the exorbitant premiums necessary for the system to work. This, too, is eminently predictable.

So, Obamacare is doomed to failure. A simple basic understanding of how people make decisions about spending money would predict this. The only way that the sort of universal health care that the liberals envision could possibly be achieved would be to forget the private insurance premise and go to a single-payer system, which Obama has tacitly supported from the beginning. To hold down costs, wage and price controls will need to be instituted, which means in the long run there will be shortages of medical personnel and equipment, because it will simply not be sufficiently attractive financially to work in that system or sell to it. The demand will increase, and the supply will decrease. This is why Canadians cross the border to get their MRI's here.

The Washington Times reported Thursday that people having expanded Medicare coverage actually increased their use of emergency rooms, when that coverage was supposed to result in decreased use and cost savings. "All else equal, basic economic theory suggests that by reducing the out-of-pocket cost of a visit that an uninsured person would face, Medicaid coverage should increase use of the emergency department," wrote the study's lead authors, Katherine Baicker of the Harvard School of Public Health and Amy Finkelstein of MIT. "It is also possible that Medicaid coverage may increase real or perceived access to emergency department care."

In other words, as above, the result, increased demand for services, was entirely predictable. So is decreased supply, though that will follow later as the burden of increased demand breaks the back of the system. Many emergency rooms, notably in California, already face this situation because legally people who don't pay for their services cannot be turned away. What would any logical person predict would happen when they are welcomed with open arms?

The question, then, is why are these laws passed when any high school economics student could predict that the schemes will not work? Why do politicians continue to propose ideas that have failed when put into practice elsewhere? Why do people vote for these same politicians? "Good intentions" is not a sufficient excuse, because they are responsible for knowing that despite their lofty rhetoric and supposed good intentions, their ideas will not work because they have not worked and cannot work.

2014 is an election year, and it is incumbent upon every voting American to become aware of what is happening. Your health care system is being destroyed, and your future experience with Obamacare will make you long for an experience like mine at the VA today. The American people have always been caring and generous, and they want to see healthcare for everyone. The problem is that the system proposed cannot possibly work, and its implementation will cause the existing system, imperfect as it is, to crumble. Bear this in mind as you consider whom to support this fall.

---------- Dr. Frederick Liewehr is an endodontist who teaches and works in private practice. He converted from Protestantism to Catholicism in 1983, having been drawn ineluctably to Christ's Church by the light of Truth. He is a member of St. Benedict parish in Richmond, a Fourth Degree Knight of Columbus and a Cooperator of Opus Dei.

---


Pope Francis: end world hunger through 'Prayer and Action'


© 2014 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM

Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for September 2014
Mentally disabled:
That the mentally disabled may receive the love and help they need for a dignified life.
Service to the poor: That Christians, inspired by the Word of God, may serve the poor and suffering.



Comments


More Politics & Policy

Rockefellers to sell investments in fossil fuel to switch to 'clean energy' Watch

Image of From left to right: Stephen Heintz, President of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Valerie Rockefeller Wayne, the chair of the fund, and Steven Rockefeller, a son of Nelson Rockefeller and a trustee of the fund, in New York, Sept. 16, 2014.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

In a bold move that illustrates just how far climate change has reached the public's consciousness, heirs to the Rockefeller family have announced that they intend to sell investments in fossil fuels and reinvest in clean energy. The announcement is a ... continue reading


CAN'T KEEP UP: So many employees leaving Department of Homeland Security, it poses risk to U.S. Watch

Image of The vacating of those in top management positions in the Department of Homeland Security has helped slow the rollout of key cybersecurity initiatives.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

The Department of Homeland Security, or DHS has seen an exodus of employees over the past four years. According to officials, this is leaving the United States open to potential terrorist strikes and cyber-attacks. LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Employees ... continue reading


Shell game in Kansas - why Democrats don't have to win Kansas to win the Senate Watch

Image of Independent investor Greg Orman seems to have the advantage in the newly-reshaped senate race.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

The race for Senate in Kansas may suddenly be the most crucial contest in the nation as Republicans scramble to protect their longtime incumbent, Bob Dole is back on the campaign trail, Democrats are being as quiet as possible about not having a candidate, and a ... continue reading


Are they on to something? Judicial Watch says terrorists are operating in Mexico Watch

Image of Beto O'Rourke, a Democrat who represents El Paso in the U.S. House of Representatives, called the area offices of various government agencies in response to a report that Middle Eastern terrorists were operating across the border in Mexico.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Judicial Watch, a controversial Web site that maintains that Middle Eastern terrorists are operating just cross the border from the United States from Mexico is evidently stirring up waves. Federal law enforcement sources in El Paso, Texas say that a United ... continue reading


CLOTHES HORSE: Wasserman Schultz losing confidence among Democrats Watch

Image of Stylish  Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman has alienated members of her own party by reportedly demanding that the party pick up the tab for her wardrobe!

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Two "faux pas" have alienated Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz from her party. Her criticism of the White House's handling of the border crisis and comparing tea party members to abusive husbands have alienated her constituency at ... continue reading


Supreme Court justice Sotomayor warns about drones encroaching on American way of life Watch

Image of Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that she's particularly troubled by the potential for commercial and government drones to compromise personal privacy.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

Unmanned surveillance planes called drones pose a threat to the privacy of American citizens, warns Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said. Speaking to students at Oklahoma City University's law school, Sotomayor says that frightening changes in technology ... continue reading


Obama says Islamic State 'is not Islamic' - what are they, then? Watch

Image of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

President Obama vowed to "degrade and destroy" the Islamic State insurgency in Iraq and Syria, He intends to do so with airstrikes and a minimal military presence on the ground. The president also declared that the Islamic State terrorists "are not Islamic." ... continue reading


Obama vows to attack Islamic State militants 'wherever they exist' Watch

Image of There has been some progress made against the group. After more than 150 U.S. airstrikes in Iraq in the past month, Iraqi and Kurdish forces have halted the Islamic State advance.

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

President Barack Obama has vowed to attack Islamic State militants "wherever they exist." Obama will be sending a limited U.S. military presence of 475 personnel. The president also declared that the United States will act in concert with a broad coalition ... continue reading


Opinion: We Need a Blue Collar Conservative like Rick Santorum in the 2016 Presidential Campaign Watch

Image of Rick Santorum is not an establishment candidate. He threatens establishment leaders in both major political parties. he has always played the role of the underdog and been counted out by the many self professed experts. That is one of the greatest assets he would bring to the 2016 Presidential campaign. He has the potential to draw voters from across party lines and help to forge a new governing coalition which can resuscitate the American dream and set us on a course to brighter future. I sincerely hope he runs.

By Keith A. Fournier

Rick Santorum is a statesman in an age of salesmen - and women. He is a man with a chest.  I will be watching his movements over the next few months. If he decides to run, and I hope he does, he will bring along with him into his presidential campaign a ... continue reading


Pelosi favors sweeping regulations to save net neutrality and ban Internet 'fast lanes' Watch

Image of

By Catholic Online (NEWS CONSORTIUM)

It's an unpopular stand for many Republicans, but House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says she wants to give federal regulators sweeping new powers over Internet access. It's a necessity in order to save net neutrality and protect Internet users, she says. ... continue reading


All Politics & Policy News

Newsletters

Newsletter Sign Up icon

Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers

Daily Readings

Reading 1, Proverbs 21:1-6, 10-13
1 Like flowing water is a king's heart in Yahweh's ... Read More

Psalm, Psalms 119:1, 27, 30, 34, 35, 44
1 How blessed are those whose way is blameless, who ... Read More

Gospel, Luke 8:19-21
19 His mother and his brothers came looking for him, ... Read More

Saint of the Day

Saint of the Day for September 23rd, 2014 Image

St. Padre Pio
September 23: Francesco, named in honor of St. Francis of Assisi, was born to ... Read More

Inform, Inspire & Ignite Logo

Find Catholic Online on Facebook and get updates right in your live feed.

Become a fan of Catholic Online on Facebook


Follow Catholic Online on Twitter and get News and Product updates.

Follow us on Twitter