Monsanto wins unanimous Supreme Court ruling
Monsanto argued farmer was required to pay to grow second crop of patented seeds.
Monsanto has won a Supreme Court case against a farmer who fought a demand from the company that he pay for a second crop of seeds he planted using their genetically modified soybeans.
The contract includes a promise from the farmer to purchase a new batch of seeds from Monsanto for any future crops, and not to save any seeds for subsequent planting.
So after his initial crop was harvested, Bowman decided to plant a second crop before the end of the season, but he wanted to use Monsanto seeds for it. His dilemma was that he'd have to buy a new batch from Monsanto if he wanted to do that, but did not wish to pay the expense.
To obtain the new seeds, he purchased seeds from a grain elevator. Bowman knew the seeds would probably contain a high proportion of seeds harvested from Monsanto stock. This would, he reasoned, allow him to grow a second crop of soybeans without violating his contract.
Not so, the company claimed, and took Bowman to court.
Monsanto argued that what he did amounted to trading harvests with other Monsanto-contracted farmers. Bowman argued that what he did was legal.
So did Bowman exploit a loophole by simply buying a cheaper, second crop of Monsanto seeds harvested from elsewhere? The Supreme Court ruled today that he did and ordered that Bowman pay $84,000 in damages to Monsanto.
Justice Elena Kagan issued the ruling saying that Bowman had violated his agreement by using seeds purchased from another crop that was also bound by a contract forbidding their planting.
Kagan explained that allowing Bowman to do what he did would essentially destroy the company's patent.
However, she also said the court was ruling very narrowly on the case at hand, and that the ruling should not be interpreted to apply to the increasingly complex issue of genetically modified crops.
"Our holding today is limited - addressing the situation before us, rather than every one involving a self-replicating product," she wrote. "We recognize that such inventions are becoming ever more prevalent, complex, and diverse. In another case, the article's self-replication might occur outside the purchaser's control. Or it might be a necessary but incidental step in using the item for another purpose."
The ruling of the court was unanimous.
© 2014 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for March 2014
Respect for Women: That all cultures may respect the rights and dignity of women.
Vocations: That many young people may accept the Lordís invitation to consecrate their lives to proclaiming the Gospel.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More U.S. News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: The New Eugenics, 'Better Babies' and the Dangers of Biotechnology
- Interview With Cardinal SeŠn Patrick O'Malley Gives Insights into the Heart of Pope Francis
- Deal W. Hudson: Why Social Conservatives Should Become Cultural Conservatives
- CORPORATE SPY: Engineering consultant accused of stealing secrets from DuPont for Chinese
- 24th season of Defending Life Premiered March 5th on EWTN
- Justina Pelletier: Massachusetts DCF Running for Cover Under Legal and Media Pressure
- Matt C. Abbott On a New Book, The Seven Big Myths About Marriage
- Deal Hudson on Culture and the Death of God
- 'Ag gag' bill passes in Idaho; filming at farms now prohibited
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?