Faith and Culture: The 'Ratzingerian Marxists' and the 'Anthropological Emergency'
Our country would be better served if the Catholic Social Doctrine was better-known by our politicians, whether they be Catholic or not
Perhaps Americans can learn from the "Anthropological Emergency" manifesto and the efforts of the "Ratzingerian Marxists" Barcellona and Paolo. God knows that our fractured society has lost the ability to communicate sensibly on those things which ought to guide our life in common and our political life. The right and the left seem to yell past each other.
But faith is not so easily suppressed, and it sometimes finds admission and flowering in the least likely of souls. Recent events in Italy seem to prove this. It is an odd phenomenon, but some of the Italian communist party, including such notables as Pietro Barcellona and Paolo Sorbi, have appeared to have abandoned Marxism and entered into the Catholic fold.
The reason? Well, of course, God-who alone moves human hearts and gives the grace of faith. But God also uses human instruments, and in this case the human instrument appears to have been Pope Benedict XVI. For this reason, these Marxist converts to the faith have been called "Ratzingerian Marxists." Perhaps a better name would be "Ratzingerian Ex-Marxists."
Pietro Barcellona, formerly a professor of Philosophy of Law and the University of Catania, and a former member of the Italian Communist party (PCI), was known as an avid exponent of Marxist atheistic materialism. But in 2010, he stirred up quite a controversy when he announced his conversion to Catholicism. Apparently, after the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the staunch communist, materialist, and evolutionist walls that Barcellona had installed in his heart to keep out faith fell also.
At first, philosophical nihilism seized him, but the non-God of materialistic evolution gives no comfort to the soul. Life, and life's work become meaningless in a world which could just as well have done without you because it does not know you. "The coming into the world of a human being has no meaning in the evolutionary sequence," Barcellona has said.
Something else had to be found to give meaning to his life. God, of course, would make the cosmos friendly, since there would be a God behind the cosmos. But Barcellona distrusted religion, as he saw it as a sort of "pure psychological projection," a comforting opiate perhaps, but no more.
Eventually, however, Barcellona came to see that this cannot be said about Christianity. "I was struck emotionally by the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The birth of Christ, in fact, is an epochal rupture in the traditional way of seeing the relationship between God and the world, between what is divine and what is human. It presents an absolute discontinuity with respect to all hypotheses regarding the understanding of God in all other religions."
Christ is the "zero point" of history: God and man met in one person. Jesus is a historical fact, and not any psychological projection or dream induced by opiates.
In 2010, Barcellona wrote about his experience in a book entitled Encounter with Jesus.
Paolo Sorbi, former professor of sociology, is also a former Marxist and former member of the Italian Communist party and convert to the Catholic faith. He currently heads up the Pro-Life office of the Archdiocese of Milan, and is the program manager of the Italian Catholic radio station, Radio Maria.
Barcellona and Sorbi, along with two other post-Marxist thinkers, the professor of history, Giuseppe Vacca, a philosopher and political scientist, Mario Tronti, joined forces in publishing a manifesto directed to the Italian left entitled "Anthropological Emergency: Towards a New Alliance Between Believers and Non-Believers." It was published in the Avvenire magazine on October 16, 2011, and it created a tremendous stir on the left.
The focus of the manifesto is on the serious threat to humanity based upon the technological manipulation of life through genetic manipulation and artificial conception. It stresses the need for the left to take seriously the threat to mankind by these technologies, to dialogue with the Catholic Church and seriously consider the the anthropological and bioethical teachings of Benedict XVI, especially those with which he was responsible while Prefect of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, such as Donum vitae, and Dignitas personae.
"The manipulation of life" the manifesto begins, "originating in the developments of technology and of the violence inherent in the processes of globalization in the absence of a new international order, puts us in the presence of an unprecedented anthropological emergency. This ...
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Europe News
- Pentecostal Pope Calls Ecclesial Movements and the Whole Church to Newness, Unity and Mission
- Historic Meeting between Pope Francis and Coptic Patriarch, Tawadros II, Fosters Christian Unity
- Pope Francis Shakes up the Ambassadors Meeting and Addresses Economic Issues
- AU CONTRAIRE! Economic crisis has been 'pulling European public opinion apart'
- Pope Calls Whole Church to Encounter Jesus Christ Personally Through the Holy Spirit
- France ponder one percent 'Internet tax' to fund domestic computer production
- Pope Francis Canonizes 802 Saints: 800 Martyrs of Otranto and Two Latin American Foundresses
- Growth in Number of Catholics Worldwide, Along with Priests and Deacons
- Scientists confirm that Roman Empire was destroyed by plague
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?