The Incomprehensible Name of God: YHWH
change," which--when coupled with his fidelity--means that he is "ever faithful to Himself and to his promises," and is "abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness." CCC § 212, 214 (Cf. Jas. 1:7; Ex. 34:6)
God's name expresses his uniqueness--He is the one and only God. One of the "riches contained in the revelation of the divine name" is that "God is unique; there are no other gods beside him." CCC § 212 (Is. 44:6)
God's name suggests that he is transcendent, that, as creator of heaven and earth, "He transcends the world and history." CCC § 212.
"The revelation of the ineffable name "I AM WHO AM" contains then the truth that God alone IS. . . . . God is the fullness of Being and of every perfection, without origin and without end. All creatures receive all that they are and have from him; but he alone is his very being, and he is of himself everything that he is." CCC § 213.
As a theologian, Joseph Ratzinger suggests that we go beyond these truths, without denying them in any sense, and discover something even more marvelous. Is YHWH even properly speaking a name? "This question may at first seem nonsensical, for it is indisputable that Israel knew the word Yahweh as a name for God," as, of course, does the Catechism.
What Ratzinger suggests is that the revelation by God that his name is YWHW is really a "rebuff" or a "refusal to give a name than the announcement of a name." God's name may be that he is nameless because His real essence, as God, is unknowable. As Meister Eckhart puts it "God is nameless, for no man can know or say anything of Him."
Ratzinger suggests perhaps even the implication of a divine displeasure--I would have suggested coyness--at Moses' importunity at asking God a question which is unanswerable to men: "I am just who I am."
(God, it seems, cannot be known by name until he became incarnate and received the human name of Jesus. There is no problem in naming a person who has a human nature.)
Ratzinger compares the Mosaic theophany with a similar event in Judges 13:18 where Manoah asks the God he meets for his name. "Why do you ask my name, seeing it is a secret?" (or "wonderful") Through this deft question, God avoids having to reveal his name to Manoah perhaps because Manoah is incapable of comprehending it.
Something similar happens to Jacob in Genesis 32:29, the great wrestling match of Jacob with God. After his lengthy wrestling with God, Jacob asks this stranger his name, only to receive a deflection, a "gesture of repulse": "Why is it that you ask my name?" Since God's substance--his name--is incomprehensible, there is no good reason for asking such a question because even if God answered it, man has no capacity for it.
Ratzinger suggest that the reason that God avoids giving his name in any ordinary sense is to distinguish Himself from the gods of the nations all about Israel. The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob does not have the same kind of name as the many gods of the nations round about Israel.
"The God of the burning bush will not put himself on a level with them." A name comprehends, restrains, allows control over a god, and the God will not--cannot--be comprehended by a creature.
At best, God's name--YHWH--is only a name in an analogical sense. God's name is similar to the names we give people and places and with which we are familiar. But there is an infinite difference or dissimilarity between God's name and those names, common and proper, with which we are familiar.
God's response to Moses and His revelation of the name YHWH, suggests Ratzinger, "serves as a kind of negative theology." It is a name that is not an ordinary name, as it "cancels out the significance of the name as a name; it effects a sort of withdrawal from the only too well known, which the name seems to be, into the unknown, the hidden." It is a name infinitely above any other name that we know while pilgrims on this earth. It is beyond our experience.
So the name-which-is-not-a-name with which God responds to Moses, "dissolves the name into mystery, so that the familiarity and unfamiliarity of God, concealment and revelation, are indicated simultaneously. The name, a sign of acquaintance, becomes the cipher for the perpetually unknown and unnamed quality of God. Contrary to the view that God can here be grasped, so to speak, the persistence of an infinite distance is in this way made quite clear."
"To this extent it was in the last analysis a legitimate development that led people in Israel more and more to avoid pronouncing this name, to use some sort of periphrasis, so that in the Greek Bible it no longer occurs at all but is simply replaced by the word "Lord." This development shows in many ways a more accurate understanding of the mystery of the burning bush than multifarious learned philological explanations do."
In our next article, we will address this last issue, i.e., the Jewish practice of avoid pronouncing the name of God, and the use of some sort of periphrasis--usually the use of the word Adonai (in Hebrew, meaning Lord), though the name YHWH remained in the Hebrew text.
In the Greek translation of the Jewish Scriptures which occurred in the 2nd century B.C. under Jewish auspices, the Septuagint, the name YHWH was replaced in the text with Kyrios (the Greek word for "Lord). Therefore, referring to YHWH as "Lord" was a custom which was carried over by the Christians, who did not use the Tetragrammaton YWHW, but used the Septuagint where it had been replaced with Kyrios ("Lord" in Greek).
In the Latin translations of the Old Testament, the practice was carried over with the use of Dominus ("Lord" in Latin). It is a custom followed by the Catholic Church in her official translations of the Scriptures, and in her liturgy, where the divine name--YHWH--is replaced by the word Lord (in capital letters to indicate that it is in stead of the divine name).
We shall see in the next article that this practice has tremendous implications in our understanding of Jesus--His name, and Who He claimed to be--and in the way we worship God in the liturgy.
-----
Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas. He is married with three children. He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum. You can contact Andrew at agreenwell@harris-greenwell.com.
- - -
Pope Benedict XVI's Prayer Intentions for January 2013
General Intention: The Faith of Christians. That in this Year of Faith Christians may deepen their knowledge of the mystery of Christ and witness joyfully to the gift of faith in him.
Missionary Intention: Middle Eastern Christians. That the Christian communities of the Middle East, often discriminated against, may receive from the Holy Spirit the strength of fidelity and perseverance.
Keywords: YHWH, Tetragrammaton, He Who Is, God, Moses, Ratzinger, St. Thomas Aquinas, Andrew M. Greenwell
NEWSLETTERS »
Rate This Article
1 - 3 of 3 Comments
Leave a Comment
More Living Faith News
- The Paraclete: The Counselor Who Helps Us Fulfill Our Calling
- C-section leaves mom fighting for life over dreaded flesh-eating virus
- Pope Francis tells world's leaders to abandon 'cult of money'
- Saint Cyril of Alexandria Reminds Us: The Holy Spirit Helps Us to Live a New Kind of Life
- Women, Behold Our Mother
- Pope Francis canonizes over 800 new saints
- Transubstantiation: Bulwark Defending the 'Is' of Jesus
- GOSNELL GUILTY!
- When Death Arrives, Will You Say Joyfully: O Death, Where is Thy Sting?
Featured News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Most Popular
Editorial: Is the Scandal Ridden Obama Administration Becoming a House of Cards? Read More
Did God make junk? Scientists say 98 percent of human genome is junk Read More
There's the problem! Americans are out of touch with scientific consensus on climate change Read More
Courageous Cardinal Seán Patrick O'Malley Will Not Attend Boston College Commencement Read More
Sex In Uniform: Why the Increase in Sexual Assaults in the Military? Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Acts 28:16-20, 30-31
On our arrival in Rome Paul was allowed to stay in lodgings of ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 11:4, 5, 7
Yahweh in his holy temple! Yahweh, his throne is in heaven; his ... Read More
Gospel, John 21:20-25
Peter turned and saw the disciple whom Jesus loved following ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. Pope John I
May 18: St. John I, Pope and Martyr (Feast day - May 18) A native of ... Read More
Latest Videos
Pope to Pontifical Missionary Works: Your work is still relevant View Video
Pope rails against dictatorship of the economy View Video
May Crowning of the Virgin Mary - St Philip The Apostle Catholic Church View Video
St Thomas Aquinas Catholic School Visit to Ogwen Cottage May 2013 View Video
May 17 - Homily: St. Paschal, Profound Love For The Eucharist View Video





















Louis,
While do take exception with you statement about God being a triune God, i find it better to correct what see as false statements being repeated as facts.
Lucifer is not the name of that angel who rebelled against God. We do not know this creatures name. He is called "the Devil" which is a title meaning "liar". He is also described as a resister or opposer which why the name Satan is used to describe his disposition.
The word or title satan is a universal word meaning that anyone or anything can be a satan. In many places in the Hebrew Scriptures, the word satan appears without the definite article. Used in this way, it applies in its first appearance to the angel that stood in the road to resist Balaam as he set out with the objective of cursing the Israelites (Numbers 22:22, 32). In other instances it refers to individuals as resisters of other men ((1 Samuel 29:4; 2 Samuel 19:21, 22; 1 Kings 5:4; 11:14, 23, 25). But it is used with the definite article ha to refer to Satan the Devil, the chief Adversary of God (Job 1:6, Zechariah 3:1, 2). In the Greek Scriptures the word sa·ta·nas' applies to Satan the Devil in nearly all of its occurrences and is usually accompanied by the definite article ho.
So, Lucifer is translated from Hebrew word heh·lel', "shining one." Heh·lel' is not a name or a title but, rather, a term describing the boastful position taken by Babylon's dynasty of kings of the line of Nebuchadnezzar. It is only in some Bible translations where the Latin Vulgate term is retained.
That the description "shining one" is given to a man and not to a spirit creature is further seen by the statement: "Down to Sheol you will be brought." Sheol is the common grave of mankind, not a place occupied by Satan the Devil. Moreover, those seeing Lucifer brought into this condition ask: "Is this the man that was agitating the earth?" Clearly, "Lucifer" refers to a human, not to a spirit creature (Isaiah 14:4, 15, 16).
By saying "I am who I am" to the question from Moses God was searching himself to mean He is God , which is to say He is The God & there is no other. However in terms of His name He told Moses "Go tell them "I AM'' send you. So the revelation to His name is "I AM' understood as Life that has no beginning or end which is His state for His name is His state, so is His state His name, meaning He is one in state & name . As far as the Jews name "hashem" read backwards more or less is to the pronunciation- Mesiah. This is like god instead searching himself to reveal "I am" is saying "am I" to questioning himself. On this there sure is a lot of difference, the difference between true & false.
Splendid article, but slightly misleading.
From the Old and New Testaments, we know with certainty that God exists as a Trinity. But all the various "names" granted to man by which to know God are actually titles with meanings. For example, the name "Jesus Christ" is a title translated to mean "the anointed one through whom God grants salvation." However, God has an actual personal name that He has not revealed to mankind. "He has a name written which no man knows except himself." (APOC. 19:12)
Upon entering the "holy of holies" in ancient Hebrew temples, the Jewish high priest's deepest aspiration was to be told God's true name, yet no high priest was ever granted that privilege. Neither will anyone be granted that privilege until being invited to the Wedding Feast of the Lamb in Heaven after the Final Judgment, at which time God will reveal His secrets to the saved. "There is nothing hidden that will not be made known."
Lucifer and his rebellious angels will not be invited to that holy event. Hence, for all eternity they will never learn God's personal name, nor will they ever see Him in the fullness of His glory. The closest Lucifer has ever come to God was to speak with Him through a obscuring veil.