Michael Terheyden on 'Why I am Catholic: Confronting Secularist Culture'
Modern Western secularism has mutated into an ideology
When I realized that secularism was irrational and intolerant, I rejected it, but I was still not sure what to trust. If I had trusted in Jesus, I would have known that our nature reaches beyond the material universe in search of God. But not just any god, the Christian God.
Tolerance or indifferentism?
In my last article, I mentioned some philosophical ideas (materialism, idealism, subjectivism, relativism, skepticism, and nihilism) which have had a large impact on our society and, consequently, on all of us. These ideas undermined much of what my parents and my Church had taught me, especially before I learned about them. But the more I learned about these philosophical ideas, the more their grip on me slowly loosened.
Part of this learning process occurred in the classroom. Books familiarized me with these ideas and helped me recognize them as they spread throughout our culture and mutated. But the heart of this process occurred in the context of my daily life and a rapidly changing culture. I read about these ideas in the news. I saw them reflected in the popular social and political issues consuming our society. I watched my friends interact with them. I too interacted with them.
Going through this learning process, forced me to evaluate my beliefs more carefully. As a result, these ideas and the issues of our time slowly came into sharper focus. The more clearly I saw them, the more chaotic, ugly, unappealing, and harmful they appeared to me; and the more disenchanted I became with the popular secular culture. In time, my disenchantment grew so strong that I began searching for truth and meaning in other places: Eastern thought, Protestantism and finally Catholicism.
Therefore, the culture I grew up in played a huge role in my faith journey. So in order to explain some of the main reasons why I am Catholic, I need to reflect on our culture. Two words best describe Western culture or society for me, secularism and Postmodernism. In the remainder of this article, I will reflect on secularism: how I understand it and what it means to me. In my next article, I will do the same with Postmodernism.
As I have said before, I am aware of two senses of secularism. The first sense refers to secularism as being worldly or not pertaining to religion. I was referring to this first sense when I wrote an article about experiencing secular studies. My original understanding of a secular society was based on this first sense. A secular society was neutral toward religion. It put people's shared humanity above their differences, and the result was a more pluralistic and tolerant society.
In my mind, American democracy originally represented secularism in this sense of the word. From the beginning, Americans of different faiths and nationalities were, in general, able to participate together in public life. Of course, this was only possible because these different people had a similar sense of decency and the common good. Even though America was imperfect, it was the most pluralistic, open, tolerant, and fair society I have ever known.
But this is not the sense of secularism that prevails in many Western societies today. Modern Western secularism has mutated into an ideology, which reflects a second sense of secularism. To help me put these two senses of secularism into perspective, I would like to draw upon comments made by the Deputy Patriarch of the Coptic Catholic Church in Egypt, Yohanna Qulta. He made these comments at the beginning of this year, around the time that Egypt was taking its first tentative steps toward a democracy.
He said, "The role of religion is to educate the human conscience. It shapes the conscience of humans, so that merchants have a conscience, engineers have a conscience, laborers have a conscience. Religion is not supposed to regulate traffic or taxes, or to determine whether one should wear the hijab or niqab. Religion is supposed to advise and guide, but to leave one with freedom of choice."
In the second part of his first encyclical, God Is Love, Pope Benedict XVI voices similar thoughts. He reminds us that the distinction between what belongs to Caesar and what belong to God is fundamental to Christianity (Mt 22:21). At the same time, he says that the just ordering of society and the state is the responsibility of politics but that politics needs to be based on objective reason informed by faith. He reminds us that Saint Augustine once said, "A state which ...
Rate This Article
1 - 1 of 1 Comments
Leave a Comment
More Living Faith News
- An Anatomy of Christian Joy: 'Be, Jesus, Our Joy!'
- In Imitation of St. Joseph, Model of Fathers of Families
- Fathers Are Guardians of the Family
- Pope Francis: Freedom Means Always Choosing the Good; A Challenge in Today's World
- Pope Francis attracts record breaking number of Twitter followers en Espanol
- Meet these senators who are unafraid to talk about their faith
- 'Lady' the black labrador survives after being shot 100 times with a BB gun
- HARROWING ORDEAL: Nigerian man survives boat capsize in air bubble
- Pope Francis Refers to 'gay lobby' inside Vatican
Featured News
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Most Popular
No-one Can Change the Truth About Fatherhood. Love Your Father. Be a Good Father Read More
Fall of the Wall of Silence: More on Pope Francis and Reports of a 'Gay Lobby' in the Roman Curia Read More
Pope Francis Refers to 'gay lobby' inside Vatican Read More
Courageous Cardinal George of Chicago Defends Marriage, Calls for Public Conversion Read More
Why Catholics Have Failed Our Culture: The Bottom Line Read More
Daily Readings
Reading 1, Second Corinthians 11:1-11
I wish you would put up with a little foolishness from me -- ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 111:1-2, 3-4, 7-8
Alleluia! I give thanks to Yahweh with all my heart, in the ... Read More
Gospel, Matthew 6:7-15
'In your prayers do not babble as the gentiles do, for they ... Read More
Saint of the Day
St. Vincent Kaun
June 20: Martyr of Japan. A native of Korea, he was brought to Japan in ... Read More
Latest Videos
Vatican Museum, Rome - Ceiling and Wall Artwork View Video
Flooding prevents pilgrims from reaching Catholic shrine View Video
Credo Series - Episode 7 View Video
Credo Series - Episode 8 View Video
About 200 people evacuated from the Lourdes Shrine, as floods hit Southern France View Video
Marketplace
The Belisarius Series
"In a nutshell, I loved it....[Belisarius] is a model for us and for ... Read More




Print















To the DNC falseness- "It is not man that adopts god , but it is God that Adopts man". To this in short -modern secularism is to a false Freedom, its religion is to false gods. False gods mean any thing other than God, who at one time were true(for all that God creates is Good) but fell. This is the truth mentioned of Lucifer & his fallen angels. That same falseness claimed as truth that which is adopted By the DNC platform, a typical case of they who represent America, move away from the Truth into the falseness signified by the fallen Angels. This is called "the betrayal" through commercialism in the greed, reflecting Judas who betrayed Jesus for a few pieces of silver-commercial greed. How many Americans know that this 'Betrayal" was Spiritually signified by the visit of Obama to India with a large military Contingent, riding His "beast" through the streets of Bombay, which is but putting His allegiance to those beliefs, on behalf of America & as stated in Daniel of the manner,"a king who has understanding of dark sentences, not regarding the God of his fathers, but in his own estate worships a strange god, a god of forces, Strange 'cause he has the face of a monkey, who again is under the gods above him, reflecting all those "secular" symbols- of the fallen ones, & as stated in acts" The star of your god Remphan , figures which ye made to worship them". This act "is the sell out of the soul of a nation (a nation which was said to have been under God) & the reason stated -"Commercial". better said "For a few crumbs of Glitter"