Why the unemployment number really is bogus
Jack Walsh explains why the figure is too subjective to decide an election.
In an op ed in the Wall Street Journal, Jack Welch, explained just why he finds the Obama unemployment numbers to be wrong. And of course, he's right.
Jack Welch found himself in the crosshairs of the Obama administration after he correctly pointed out the jobs figures were bogus.
Welch's implication that the Obama administration somehow "cooked the books" was unappreciated by the Obama campaign which proudly declared the 7.8 percent figure to the public as a sign of progress. And a significant one at that too - no president has ever been reelected with unemployment over 8 percent.
So the Obama camp certainly has motive, but motive doesn't mean they would go so far as to deliberately manipulate the data to show improvement. Turns out, they don't even have to.
We all know there are three kinds of lies in the world. Lies, damn lies, and statistics, as the saying goes. But why are these statistics so questionable?
The Labor Department will be the first to admit that there is considerable subjectivity in their reports. In fact, there's so much subjectivity that it is standard practice to change the numbers in the months that follow, as new, more concrete data is fed into the statistics. It is wiser to regard the report as a preliminary estimate, rather than a hard finding.
The methods of gathering the number include attempting to contact some 60,000 people, most by phone, and some by visit, to ask if they are working. The definition of who is and isn't working is fairly broad, so as Welch explained in his op ed, a woman who is babysitting for a week to earn bus fare is counted as working.
Welch says he believes the economy is improving, however he notes that the growth is very slow. The economy isn't roaring back as it did during the Reagan years. Of course, if you listen to the Obama camp, they're proud of the 7.8 figure and are trumpeting it at every opportunity as a sign that Obama's policies are finally paying off.
Interesting, because that 7.8 percent payoff in any other year would be considered a source of shame for most presidents.
So what are people to do?
Nothing suggests Welch. "The coming election is too important to be decided on a number," he wrote. "Especially when that number seems so wrong."
© 2014 - Distributed by THE NEWS CONSORTIUM
Pope Francis Prayer Intentions for March 2014
Respect for Women: That all cultures may respect the rights and dignity of women.
Vocations: That many young people may accept the Lordís invitation to consecrate their lives to proclaiming the Gospel.
Rate This Article
Leave a Comment
More Business & Economics News
- Wowza! Restaurant starts charging diners for Obamacare
- Time banking - where time is BETTER than MONEY
- Google tops Exxon as world's second-most valuable company - for a day
- Bill Gates thinks poverty will be eliminated by 2035... But he's missing this one thing!
- World's richest playboys forgot to address the world's most serious problems between parties in Davos
- CROWDFUNDING: Brother, can you spare - funding for my new movie project?
- Here we go again! Increase the government's borrowing limit before late February, Treasury Secretary warns
- Pope Francis sends a message to Davos elites -- they'd do well to listen
- For each baby born since Obama took office, debt has increased by $1,608,304
- Fr. Paul Schenck: Finding Living Faith on Catechetical Sunday
- The Movie Yellow: Incest as 'Normal' and Cassavates's Slides Into the World of Woes
- The Chicago School Teachers Strike Reveals the Need For School Choice
- The Sexual Barbarians and the Dissolution of Culture
- The Happy Priest Challenges Us to Ask: Who is Jesus to Me?
- Michael Coren on Canadian Public Schools: Teachers, leave those kids alone
- We Cannot Ignore Our Consciences: Cardinal Dolan On Religious Liberty
- In the Face of Danger, Successor of Peter Travels to Lebanon as a Messenger of Peace
- Reflections on the Dignity and Vocation of Women: Who or What?
Disclaimer: The columns, articles, advertisers claims and any other features provided on Catholic Online Business & Economics are provided for personal finance and investment information and are not to be construed as investment advice. Under no circumstances does the information in this content represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. The views and opinions expressed in an article or column are the author's own and not necessarily those of Catholic Online and there is no implied endorsement by Catholic Online of any advice or trading strategy.